The Filter Coffee

Foreign policy, strategic affairs, defense and governance

Terrorism in India: A Cold Analysis – Part II

(Also see: Terrorism in India: A Cold Analysis – Part I)

In the first part of this two-series article, I reviewed the government’s response to the November 25, 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks, specific intelligence and coordination failures between State and Central agencies and armed forces, the political fallout in the aftermath of the attack, and the government’s responses to addressing an impotent internal security apparatus. In this article, I will examine what needs to be done by the government of India if it wants to demonstrate that it is committed to securing the lives of its citizens.

In response to the terror attacks, the Indian government is planning to increase the headcount of the National Security Guard (NSG) and establish centers in Mumbai, Bangalore, Hyderabad and Chennai.  The second item on the government’s plan of action involves establishing a Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) along the lines of the United States’ Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Based on the “Combating Terrorism” report issued by the Second Administrative Reforms Committee, the FIA will be established as an agency of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and will be responsible for investigating federal crimes, including organized crime, terrorism, sedition, trafficking in arms and human beings, etc.

What else can India do? The past couple of days have made it particularly painful to watch Indian news channels or read Indian newspapers. Uninformed jingoism, poor grammar and unhinged newscasters have made following the coverage of the aftermath truly agonizing. On Times Now, for example, I was never quite sure if I was watching news coverage of the terror attacks or a trailer for Mission Impossible IV. If the media is to be believed, the Indian army is about to launch punitive assaults on Pakistan any time now. I hate to break this to them, but their mouths are writing checks their government can’t cash. India will not fight Pakistan, because to do so would be to write your own death certificate, along with that of Pakistan’s. Does this mean we lie down and take a kicking? Not necessarily. If India is serious about the security of its people, here are things that it should do:

Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: 11/25/2008, black cat, commandos, Congress I, homeland security, India, Indian Army, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Laskhar-e-Toiba, let, Mumbai, Mumbai Terrorist Attack, National Security Guard, nsg, Pakistan, POTA, prevention of terrorist acts, south mumbai, taj, Terrorism, unlawful activities prevention act, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

By-two Kaapi (Twitter)

  • RT @samirsaran: External Affairs Ministry strips Devyani Khobragade off her duties over vigilance case against her ibnlive.in.com/news/external-… v… » 6 hours ago
  • Ha ha ha. What does Pakistan's army think it is? | COAS warns Kabul of hot pursuit nation.com.pk/editors-picks/… » 7 hours ago
  • Astounding that Indian academic work on Jamaat ud-Dawa is shockingly pathetic (and barely existent in public domain). » 8 hours ago
  • Jamia Hafsa's Internet chatter warns of "reaction" to protests against Maulana Abdul Aziz Ghazi and Lal Masjid. » 9 hours ago
  • Has Maulana Fazlullah been killed again? » 10 hours ago
  • India's largest foreign mission footprint is in the US - a total of 6. Odd then that it would have 22 in Afghanistan, no GHQ trolls? » 11 hours ago
  • With the exception of issues pertaining to Bangladesh and Kashmir, Nawa-i-waqt has departed from its conservative nationalist stance. » 12 hours ago
  • Very interesting that there has been a decisive shift in the editorial slant of the Waqt Group since the passing of Majid Nizami. » 12 hours ago
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.